After
a hectic few weeks at the top of WWE’s main event schedule, the company present
their first annual (and judging by pay-per view experiments) last
‘Battleground’ event from the big apple. After many months speculation over a
proposed WarGames match – which we now know will not happen – WWE is banking on
its newest and quickly to become its most stale feud if it doesn’t find a way
to divert it, to sell its premier ‘Battleground’ show.
So
as the curtain goes up on WWE Battleground 2013 let’s take a look what we can
expect from on October 6th, from the First Niagara Centre in Buffalo, New York.
WWE Championship Match
Daniel Bryan vs Randy
Orton
Before
we begin, let me just say that WWE have missed a trick with this whole pay-per
view and Daniel Bryan vs The Corporation storyline as we head into
Battleground. Months before the pay-per view came close to happening, when it
was announced months previous, there was massive speculation that WWE, on the
back on the successful ‘WarGames: WCW’s Most Notorious Matches’ DVD and Blu-ray
would gold its own WarGames match up at Battleground – the seemingly perfect
setting for the match to be revived.
Fans
hopes for a WarGames Match in 2013 were dealt a huge blow when the seating
plans for the event were unveiled and it detailed space for just one ring and
no room for a double cage. However, at SummerSlam and the weeks unfolding from
it, WWE had the perfect reason to stage a match of that calibre in order for
Daniel Bryan to try and extract revenge against Randy Orton and The
Corporation. Another Daniel Bryan vs Randy Orton match almost devaluates the
singles feud somewhat and for maximum effect, WWE really should followed the
guidelines set by WCW in 1997 – which we will come to in a moment.
On
the September 16th edition of Monday Night Raw, WWE once again strengthened an
argument for a WarGames Match when it had some of the faces come to Daniel
Bryan’s rescue. These, for those who didn’t see it involved Dolph Ziggler, The
Usos, The Prime Time Players, Kofi Kingston, R-Truth, Zack Ryder and Rob Van
Dam. It might have seemed having wrestlers who were so low on WWE’s food chain
– barring Dolph Ziggler – was writing on the wall as to where WWE saw this feud
and Daniel Bryan’s career going after this spat with Triple H, Stephanie
McMahon, Vince McMahon and Randy Orton was over. I disagree. Whilst the company
could have done with a few more star names in the mix of saviours on September
16th, it was an encouraging sign that the company were willing to spread the
boundaries of such a prestigious feud down the card instead of just keeping it
at the top.
The
inclusion of such teams as The Prime Time Players – who have been turned face
because of Darren Young’s brave decision to come out in public – and The Usos
will now have a huge knock-on effect on the tag team division and make it seem
a lot more important than it actually is. Now, with a WarGames Match, WWE could
have healed at least thirty or forty percent of the division’s problems in one
foul swoop. If WWE had booked the WarGames Match to be Daniel Bryan, Dolph
Ziggler, Rob Van Dam and The Usos vs Randy Orton, Triple H and The Shield then
it would have been a momentous time for the tag teams involved and main event
exposure would have made the tag team division and WWE Tag Team Championships –
as well as the WWE United States Championship – look wholly important again.
There
is an argument against having such low standing wrestlers in a match of
WarGames calibre, would they bring it down? Would they be important enough in
the fans eyes to convey in the ring, the importance of the match? Certainly all
involved have the ability to do so, but if you don’t try then you will never
know.
WWE
have done a grand job of promoting this feud despite a few hiccups. Everyone
has played their part to perfection and the reasons given for screwing Daniel
Bryan, that he’s not what Vince wants or ever envisaged for the future of WWE,
that the McMahon’s see him as a B+ and not an A+ when in truth he’s top of
class, are all believable excuses and based in reality. Vince McMahon and his
followers really do believe that Daniel Bryan isn’t the best wrestler the
company has at the moment. Why? Because he doesn’t wrestler the WWE way,
because he’s a former independent circuit wrestler, the truth is those reasons
are not alone. In Vince’s eyes, Daniel Bryan is too small to be the figurehead
of WWE in the future, even though he’s ten times better than John Cena.
Now
this is the second pay-per view main event match between Daniel Bryan and Randy
Orton, though this will be fought to see who captures the vacant WWE
Championship, let’s take a look at where this is going. WWE have a perfect
chance to make something new for the future of this company out of this feud.
Whilst a Daniel Bryan WWE Championship win at Battleground would all but end
the feud, common sense says that he has to win it when the feud comes to an
end. For me, Night of Champions was a mistake. There was no need to have Daniel
Bryan defeat Randy Orton that quickly only to strip him of the title the next
night. The outcome of that match devaluated Orton as a heel and made him look
like that in one on one competition he couldn’t beat Bryan.
The
correct result would have been Randy Orton retain the gold without help to set
him up as a strong heel going forward. For the title to change hands on their
first main event face off was an anti-climax and now WWE have to make up for
that. Ideally, WWE would have kept Bryan and Orton apart in the ring for as
long as possible, as WCW did with Sting and Hulk Hogan in 1997. The diversion
tactic of having Sting and Hogan kept at a distance from each other for nearly
nine months yielded WCW’s biggest and most successful pay-per view event
‘Starrcade’ in 1997 as people flocked to the arena and ordered the event in
their hundreds of thousands to see two men who hadn’t touched each other since
the beginning of the feud at the beginning of the year, finally square off for
the title.
Had
WWE kept Orton and Bryan apart until WrestleMania then the company would surely
have had one its biggest live attendance records – that wasn’t fabricated – and
pay-per view buy rate numbers in history. It wouldn’t have been difficult
either. The two could have traded words and threats on Raw and Smackdown to
keep the feud alive, whilst Orton got The Shield to do his dirty work to avoid
contact with Bryan. On pay-per view, Triple H would have been a distraction for
Bryan whilst Randy Orton ran through the top of the card to cement his heel
status and viability as WWE Champion. When Bryan was finished with Triple H,
there were a whole number of distractions WWE could have employed along the
Road to WrestleMania to make sure the feud was kept alive but also the pair
didn’t actually collide.
The
first is Survivor Series. Had Daniel Bryan and Triple H fought at Battleground
with Randy Orton watching in the wings, then WWE could have promoted a huge
Survivor Series Elimination Match in November, Team Orton vs Team Bryan. The
match could have been used to get some of the lower card talent over which WWE
need to do, whilst Orton avoided Bryan at all costs. Had Bryan teamed with The
Usos, The Prime Time Players, Zack Ryder and Dolph Ziggler to take on Randy
Orton, The Shield, The Real Americans and a returning Cody Rhodes then WWE
could have used everyone else as a distraction whilst Orton and Bryan elevated
others round them before Bryan chased Orton away and the pair were eliminated
via double count out. They disappear into the back thus avoiding contact and
the rest are left to shine.
At
TLC, Triple H challenges Daniel Bryan to a TLC match, the stipulation is that
if Triple H wins then Daniel Bryan will have to start back at the bottom of the
ladder. At the December event, Triple H triumphs and just when all is lost for
Bryan he enters the Royal Rumble and wins, earning his place at WrestleMania.
Elimination Chamber wouldn’t have been a problem as Daniel Bryan put his
WrestleMania main event spot on the line in a gauntlet match against The Shield
and Triple H whilst Randy Orton triumphed in the Elimination Chamber Match. The
stage would have been set then for Randy Orton vs Daniel Bryan at WrestleMania
30. The fans would be hot for the match which they wouldn’t have seen before
and WWE would have been able to enter double figures without booking The Rock
in the main event of the show.
It
was an easy and simple plan. Along the way, to combat Vince and Stephanie,
Shane and Linda McMahon could have been re-introduced to the company – which
they almost certainly will be anyway, it’s a wasted opportunity for them to sit
on the sidelines, especially as Shane McMahon would bring the house down nearly
four years after he departed the company. WWE have squandered a brilliant
opportunity to book an unforgettable feud and draw huge numbers for their annual
show stealer.
The
way the feud is being booked at the moment, in the ring, then it tells me that
WWE are biding their time until John Cena returns from injury, so they can
paint Bryan as the man who was never good enough and John Cena as the hero who
vanquished The Corporation upon his return. If that happens it would be a
crying shame. Daniel Bryan can come out of this feud with the aura of the
future of WWE. But if John Cena comes back and is immediately inserted into the
feud, in Bryan’s place, then WWE deserve a kick in the head. Sadly though that
seems to be the plan at the moment and as we strive ever closer to WrestleMania
30 WWE’s plans as they stand – they will change – are this:
The
Rock vs Brock Lesnar or Brock Lesnar vs C.M Punk – if The Rock doesn’t want to
wrestle again, Randy Orton vs John Cena for the WWE Championship and C.M Punk
vs The Undertaker – if The Rock agrees to a match against Brock Lesnar – or The
Undertaker vs Ryback, John Cena or Daniel Bryan depending on what happens with
the WWE Championship picture and possibly Daniel Bryan vs Triple H. It may not
sound like a bad line up right now, but WWE really need to being finding ways
around attracting millions of people to the event without The Undertaker and
The Rock as two of the three star names. The Rock and The Undertaker are about
to enter their final year(s) in the wrestling industry and when they’re gone
it’s going to be up to stars like Randy Orton and Daniel Bryan to put bums in
seats. What better place to start than now?
Winners Prediction:
Randy Orton
World Heavyweight
Championship Match
Battleground Hardcore
Rules Match
(c)
Alberto Del Rio vs Rob Van Dam
The
whole storyline surrounding this feud, of Ricardo Rodriguez betraying Alberto
Del Rio, the man he was seemingly loyal to until the end, stinks of a set up. I
have been saying for months that to give Alberto that extra dimension and make
Ricardo mean something in WWE, that the ring announcer needs to turn on Del Rio
but it would have been much more effective had Ricardo done so when Del Rio was
face and not heel. Now Alberto Del Rio is a heel and a very good one at that,
what does Ricardo’s face turn and union with Rob Van Dam have to offer this
feud, if it’s not a set up?
After
Rodriguez’s suspension for violation of the WWE Wellness Policy and thirty day
suspension WWE had to find something to do with him. Had he come back and just
played the role of Del Rio’s manager / announcer yet again then it would have
been samey. And samey is the last thing that Alberto Del Rio needs right now,
especially since he’s just fell into the niche of a killer heel role – one he
never managed to get the feeling of the first time around. Putting Rodriguez
with Van Dam allows WWE to open up other avenues for the pair to go down, when
Rodriguez inevitably costs Van Dam the World Heavyweight Championship just when
it looks like he’s going to triumph once again.
After
all, that’s why Rodriguez is with RVD. Those who thought that WWE were doing
something different in the long run with Del Rio and Ricardo are either
misguided or do not know wrestling well enough to know when the company is
trying to pull the wool over our eyes. If WWE weren’t planning a set up of RVD
then ask yourself this. Why put Rodriguez with Van Dam when the pair have had
not other dealings? Surely, if you wanted to put anyone with RVD it would be
Paul Heyman. Considering they have a storied history and that Heyman is
currently involved with his own stable of wrestlers, namely Ryback, Lesnar and
Axel who are feuding with C.M Punk. Adding RVD to Heyman’s stable would be a
huge plus for Heyman.
Currently,
its Ryback vs C.M Punk yet again coming out of Night of Champions, surely RVD
vs C.M Punk would have been a better and much more gripping feud in the ring?
As it is though, Alberto Del Rio and Rob Van Dam are just filler until WWE come
up with something better for the current World Heavyweight Champion. In 2013,
WWE do not see Rob Van Dam as a viable replacement for Alberto Del Rio as World
Heavyweight Champion and past events – namely RVD’s drug bust when he was WWE
Champion in 2006 – won’t help matters in the companies mind. Even if they could
get past that, the likelihood of them making a former TNA wrestler World
Heavyweight Champion is slim to none. WWE know of RVD’s history in TNA, they
just don’t want to mention it.
The
lousy DQ finish at Night of Champions was necessity for WWE to set up this
match at Battleground. Had Alberto Del Rio been counted out then WWE ran the
risk of the Mexican looking like a weak Champion who was unable to defend his
Championship and the same would go for had Del Rio been pinned – of course he
would have lost the Championship. This way, Del Rio may have gotten himself
disqualified but he not only maintained his heel image, but in a way he
elevated it. When Alberto Del Rio walked into Night of Champions in September
he was a heel Champion who was prospering. A man who would do whatever he could
to retain the Championship around his waist. When he left Night of Champions,
Alberto Del Rio was a threat to every superstar in the locker room. A man with
determination enough, to the audience at least, to break another man’s arm if
it meant he would still be the man on Smackdown. So as much as we may gripe
about the finish, I can see why WWE booked it. It protected both Champion and
Challenger.
Some
would argue that Alberto Del Rio has had his chance to shine and failed twice
over. It’s a point I can see as relevant. Hid first heel run in 2010 was less
than thrilling. Del Rio had the goods in the ring but elsewhere he lacked
certain traits which screamed ‘Champion’. There was a lack of aggression when
he was performing and whilst he was technically sound you always felt kind of
like Del Rio was going through the motions. Like he knew that WWE weren’t
planning on elevating him seriously so he took the attitude of why bother? As a
face, the means of which WWE hoped he would reach superstardom, Del Rio failed
again. He had the patter but he wrestled like a heel.
Of
course, not all of Del Rio’s failures can be blamed on the man himself. WWE
have to take the brunt of the blame. It’s the company who booked him so
shoddily. Who gave him WWE Championship reigns and then terminated them less
than one month in. It’s WWE who kept booking him to lose an d its WWE who
didn’t pull him up on the fact that he was a face who was wrestling like a
heel. WWE spurned most of the chances it afforded Del Rio in recent years. Now
though, they have finally been woken up to what we have known all along. So
yes, Del Rio has had ample chance to get himself over in years past but it’s
been more other than himself who have held him back. Which is why he deserves
another chance! When you’re that good, you never give up!
Strangely,
I’ve heard grumblings from the WWE Universe about Rob Van Dam’s return to the
company. His Money in the Bank 2013 performance was as good as RVD had done in
his first stint with the company. He was sharp, on the ball and executed each
move with panache. Thankfully he had shed the weight that had been gained
wrestling for TNA. Surely the sky was the limit for RVD. And then came WWE’s
favourite method of booking the ‘Start/Stop’ method. From Money in the Bank,
RVD plummeted straight to the bottom of the card to contest a good Pre-Show /
Kick-Off Match against Dean Ambrose at SummerSlam before being shot right back
to the top of the card at Night of Champions.
It
was a dizzying time for all involved. WWE can’t expect us to believe that RVD
would go from the top, to the bottom, right back to the top again without a
build up. There was none. Had WWE kept Van Dam at the top of the card it would
have been a much better few months for the main event scene going into
SummerSlam and instead of throwing him into the pre-show effort on the summer’s
biggest show WWE could have just as easily booked a killer triple threat match
between RVD, Del Rio and Christian. That would have been an excellent
encounter. But hey, who knows what goes on in the crazy world of McMahon?
Back
the point in hand: the grumblings from the WWE Universe, that your Wrestling
God was privy to anyway, were along the lines that RVD shouldn’t be in the main
event picture at all. The reasons varied from because he was too old and forty
plus years and because he is a former WWE superstar who has come back to the
company and is taking the spotlight away from the younger guys who need it
more. The argument there is that for months, if not years now we’ve been
begging WWE to introduce something other than John Cena into its main event
scene. Ideally the answer would have come in the form of someone from NXT or
WWE’s developmental system – hell even a low to mid-card wrestler would be
welcome. However WWE have seen fit to bring back an assured headliner to answer
our calls.
Can
we criticise this? To an extent yes. It’s obvious that Vince believes bringing
back a former headliner is easier and more profitable than making a new one and
has already showed an unwillingness push anyone new up his greasy ladder
without burying them to the extent we can’t believe in them first. But on the
other hand, we asked for it. We are the ones who kept complaining about there
not being enough main event players and not enough variety in the main, so WWE
acted upon it. Unless we want to be hypocrites, then we have to live with it.
They may have gone the wrong way about giving us what we want but they’ve
delivered something at least.
Will
Rob Van Dam defeat Alberto Del Rio at Battleground? No! At least not for the World
Heavyweight Championship. If WWE plan for this to go into Hell in a Cell in
three weeks times then the match will probably end on another disqualification
or count out, because let’s be honest, three weeks isn’t a whole lot of time to
build another meaningful feud. There is the possibility that I’m wrong and WWE
plan to put the World Heavyweight Championship on RVD for three weeks, on the
understanding that he drops it back to Del Rio at Hell in a Cell. That course
of action would at least keep the feud interesting and watchable even if it was
clear Del Rio would regain the gold in 21 days.
But
that is only a theory. I don’t believe WWE have any intention of putting the
gold back around RVD’s waist and at Battleground we can expect only one
outcome.
Winners Prediction:
Alberto Del Rio
C.M Punk vs Ryback
We’ve
been here before and it didn’t end well. For those with no long term memory, in
2012 when C.M Punk was still reigning as WWE Champion, WWE decided the best
course of action would be to book Ryback as the headline face to challenge Punk
for the gold. That may have been at a time when Punk was a major heel and
Ryback a dominant face and whilst the roles have been reversed, little else has
changed in a year. Back in 2012 Ryback was still an awful performer and C.M
Punk was having to carry his opponent. The exact situation which Punk will find
himself in here.
We
all know Ryback hasn’t improved since last year. His matches against John Cena
earlier in the year ranged from good to awful, his WrestleMania match was
deplorable and at Money in the Bank he flopped against Chris Jericho. The
question is beginning to circulate that is there anyone in WWE good enough to
carry Ryback in a singles match? Even C.M Punk struggled last year when he
faced the man WWE hoped would be the next big thing in the industry, inside
Hell in a Cell. There was a reason the match went only 11 minutes and it had
very little to do with C.M Punk’s injury. Ryback is rotten in the ring and now
WWE have to find some way of covering that up, otherwise this feud which is
designed to go until Survivor Series will not last the course.
Is
there anything WWE can do to make Ryback a better wrestler? Making his matches
shorter would be the obvious choice. Like Goldberg in WCW, maybe Ryback will
prosper better in shorter matches where he only has to execute a few planned
spots and doesn’t have to do much else. It’s an answer, but not one WWE would
be willing to implement right now because they’re not willing to book C.M Punk
in a five minute match on pay-per view. The reason being, Punk has such a large
fan base that the company know people would begin to tune out if their
favourite appeared for five minutes on the monthly extravaganza and then not
again throughout the night. So that’s the short match theory struck off of the
list.
WWE
could send Ry-back to wrestling school. See what I did there? There are
trainers in WWE’s new development centre who could lend their expertise to
Ryback and possibly make him a greater performer. Some of these people have
wrestled with Ric Flair, Ricky Steamboat and some of them have been the bigger
stars in a company themselves. Their knowledge is invaluable to someone like
Ryback is he’s willing to listen and learn. It wouldn’t make any difference is
Ryback was to take a four month hiatus from television in order to come back as
a better in ring performer – in fact the fans will welcome it. But that’s not
going to happen either.
You
see, WWE have big plans for Ryback – yes, still – and don’t plan on removing him
from the company for any length of time, unless he sustains an injury which
forces him from the ring. The best WWE can come up with right now; to make
Ryback a better performer is to put him with Paul Heyman. Now undoubtedly
Heyman has an effect on wrestlers needing a lift but even he can’t help out
when Ryback is in the ring. Sure, Heyman can interfere and take some of the
pressure off of Ryback with his antics at ringside but when it comes to crunch
time, Ryback is still in there on his own. He’s still going to be the stiff as
a board wrestler we’ve seen over the last year and a bit.
After
his feud with C.M Punk, maybe it would be a good idea for WWE to place him in a
tag team. Either with someone else on the card who needs the exposure or with
Curtis Axel – whose career hasn’t taken off as predicted after his name change.
The team doesn’t necessarily have to drop down into the Tag Team Division
because I don’t think Ryback would do the doubles division any good at all.
Instead, to continue the feud with Punk WWE could find C.M a partner too. It
certainly beats seeing another singles match between the pair at Hell in a Cell
and it would give Axel and whoever is paired with Punk their fare share of the
spotlight as well. With rumour abound that Rey Mysterio is returning to WWE
after a lengthily knee injury, then what better name to help carry this feud if
WWE can’t find anyone else further down the roster more deserving.
One
has to question WWE’s long term image for Ryback and Paul Heyman’s
relationship. It clear that Ryback and Curtis Axel for that matter are never
going to be as big as Brock Lesnar, so if WWE plan to have Ryback vs Lesnar at
some point in 2014 then I would think twice about it before booking that match.
I doubt a match pitting the superior Lesnar against Ryback would sell any
pay-per view buy rates. Then again maybe WWE are hoping that the association
with Paul Heyman will make Ryback into the next Brock Lesnar. The argument
there would be that if that was going to happen then it would have done so by
now.
I
can’t imagine what WWE have planned for Ryback after this feud is over. Another
feud with the returning John Cena is surely out of the question after the last
one bombed and WWE have a lack of faces big enough to carry a feud with Ryback.
So where does that leave him going into WrestleMania XXX? Rumours abound that
if all else fails he will be fed to The Undertaker. But if C.M Punk can’t drag
a good match out Ryback then what chance does an aging Undertaker have. Even
though Undertaker is one of the most accomplished wrestlers in the history of
the industry, I doubt even he can be bothered to try and elevate Ryback on the
grandest stage of them all.
Which
means the future is up in the air for Ryback. Maybe WWE haven’t made any long term
plans for Ryback. Perhaps they are waiting to see if this feud with C.M Punk
will do something for his career. If it doesn’t then maybe Vince will admit
defeat and axe the character from his roster. After all, he’s doing no good and
has the ‘Midas Touch’ in reverse.
C.M
Punk has gone from WWE Champion to mid-card player in recent months. His
association with Paul Heyman seemed to drag him down the card after his
WrestleMania XXIX match with The Undertaker. At Payback he had a good match
with Chris Jericho followed by a good showing at Money in the Bank in the Money
in the Bank Ladder Match and a cracking match against Brock Lesnar at
SummerSlam. In recent months, WWE have relied on C.M Punk to hold together the
mid-card because they don’t have anyone else capable of doing the job.
The
problem is that C.M Punk is better than that. He’s been a mid-card player
before and it didn’t suit him all that well. There are some wrestlers who are
born to be mid-card wrestlers, who will never break through that glass ceiling
and then there are wrestlers who are born into the main event. C.M Punk falls
into the latter. He’s a natural born star and he’s much better than a spot on
the mid-card against a man who can barely look after himself in the ring let
alone another opponent. You can see why C.M Punk gets annoyed with WWE
management. After his superb effort against The Undertaker and WWE Championship
run which went from November 2011 to January 2013, Punk had earned the
company’s respect and effectively had carried WWE for more than a year when The
Rock dethroned him at Royal Rumble 2013.
When
he lost the Championship, Punk was promised great things. His match with The
Undertaker was just a small part of the reward Punk was granted by WWE for his
sterling efforts in the main event as Champion. But then it all disappeared.
The break after WrestleMania would have come as a huge relief for a man who was
working injured for months, though I suspect he expected more rewards when he
returned. I can’t tell you exactly what WWE promised C.M Punk when he returned
but I can imagine that it wasn’t this. Backstage, Punk wasn’t thrilled about
breaking from his best friend in real life, Paul Heyman. One got the message
that even though it yielded a superior match at SummerSlam 2013, Punk believed
there was more mileage in his and Heyman’s relationship. Depending on how you
look at it, he may have been right.
There
is an argument there certainly. When he split from Heyman Punk’s aura went
downhill somewhat. His matches, whilst retaining a their quality weren’t what
they were when he was battling the best and he seemed deflated that he wasn’t
back at the top where he belonged. As a heel with Paul Heyman in tow there were
more options for Punk and more roads for him to walk down. Without Heyman, Punk
is left in no mans land after the rivalry with Paul Heyman ends. He can’t go
back to the top of the card, Daniel Bryan and Randy Orton have closed ranks up
there and don’t need anyone else’s help. The Intercontinental Championship
picture is bleak and not a place that Punk needs nor wants to tread again in
the near future. It leaves limited opportunities for ‘The Voice of the
Voiceless’.
WWE
have failed to build any stars that Punk could elevate by feuding with them and
unless the company are planning another John Cena vs C.M Punk feud, something
needs to change drastically. Could rumours that Stone Cold Steve Austin is on
his way back to the company be true? They would certainly fall conveniently in
time for WrestleMania XXX and the much anticipated Punk vs Austin match. Then
again with TNA losing money faster than they can count it, some do say Hulk
Hogan will land back on WWE shores. Would a Hogan vs Punk match draw big at
WrestleMania XXX? I don’t have the answers right now but WWE need them.
Trawling through the same feuds year after year is having an adverse effect on
business and especially the WrestleMania numbers.
WWE
need to make fresh feuds for people like C.M Punk, otherwise face his star fall
altogether. After the hard work both parties have put in to get Punk where he
is today, it would be a travesty to allow him to simply get lost in the
shuffle. If WWE don’t do this then Punk needs to. Anyone who has seen ‘C.M
Punk: Best in the World’ DVD and Blu-ray will know that Punk supposedly refused
to do what WWE had booked for him for a long time and created his own
storylines. If that’s what has to happen again then so be it. After all C.M
Punk knows what’s best for his career and his character – he cannot let it go
to sleep.
At
Battleground, Ryback has to come out on top. If Punk was to defeat Ryback on
October 6th then instantly, all heat for the feud would be gone. The face would
have prevailed against the heel and there would be no point in WWE continuing
the feud. And at the rate their running out of ideas for C.M Punk, they cannot
afford to end them when they’ve only just got going.
Winners Prediction:
Ryback
WWE Divas Championship
Match
(c)
A.J Lee vs Brie Bella
The
WWE Divas Division has surprised me in recent months. I’m not talking about the
A.J Lee and Kaitlyn series of matches which were very good, but everything that
happened after that. It was vitally important to the division that WWE kept the
momentum from the A.J vs Kaitlyn feud going but apply it to something else and
to their credit they have done so. Usually around about now, WWE would have
allowed the Divas Division to slide downhill and count one gripping feud which
yielded two great singles matches enough to fill their appetite for the year.
I
was worried after SummerSlam because looking down the current Divas roster I
couldn’t see where WWE were going to get their next big Divas feud from.
Certainly the company have more woman that can’t wrestle on their books than
they do those that can, and whilst that’s something which needs to be addressed
sometime next year, Stephanie McMahon, Triple H and whoever else concocted up
this feud of A.J targeting the Total Divas women deserve a lot of credit. I
don’t know what anyone reading this thought of A.J’s blistering C.M Punk style
pipe bomb which she dropped on the cast of the almost all scripted Total Divas
– yes, WWE won’t even allow its talent to have thoughts of their own in a show
about their lives outside of the ring – but I thought it very good indeed.
Apart
from being an accomplished promo, A.J got herself over as a serious Divas and
no matter how hard WWE try to push her as the psychotic nymph who is hell bent
on destruction, the fans seem to love her. A.J has struck it big in the
wrestling industry. And she deserves it. It’s not the first time the psychotic
diva character has been wheeled out for a WWE female performer but I am
confident that A.J’s portrayal is by far the most convincing.
Now,
sitting atop the Divas mountain, A.J has the ability to take the division far,
as long as WWE allow her to thrive and don’t cut her reign short in order to
put the Championship on one of the cast of WWE’s new hit ‘reality’ show. If
that happened then whomever the recipient of the title was, they wouldn’t have earned
it and WWE would have obviously have swapped champions in order to make Total
Divas more appealing – like we haven’t suffered enough with the promotion of it
already. For A.J, as WWE Divas Champion,
there is literally nowhere WWE can’t take her, especially now she’s proved
herself in the ring and out of it.
The
storyline, based around A.J’s hatred of the Divas who have the exposure of the
Total Divas show and her insatiable desire to destroy them all is going to go
far in WWE in 2013. It’s longevity beyond the end of the year will be
questionable unless WWE introduce more Divas into the show with its second
season which has already been commissioned. The perfect road for this feud to
take would be for a couple of lesser Divas – who still have the skill to go in
the ring – to come up from NXT or developmental and be inserted straight into
Total Divas. WWE could then turn A.J onto them and how they haven’t worked for
the spot or the respect and how they’ve just got into the business to be
reality stars. It would be a logical course of action and also keep A.J busy
until WWE find something else to do with her.
Of
course finding something else for A.J is going to depend on WWE’s booking and
building of other talent around her. Faliure to build new faces will result in
the division going stale yet again. Something the company would be dumb to
allow happen. WWE need three very good females in the ring who also have a
great personality when they’re not competing between the ropes. At this point
in time things like appearance and mic work don’t matter as the company have
plenty of time to work on all of that later. But right now, it has to handpick
its three top female stars from NXT and developmental and take a chance on them
on the big stage. It’s the only way to find out if they can fly or not. Also,
WWE have to get over this fascination of their Divas possessing princess like
looks. I’d rather see two pug ugly dogs contest a thrilling match than two
beautiful women fumble around the ring for ten minutes and bore us to death.
I,
like everyone else know that the storyline and inclusion of Brie Bella to the
WWE Divas Championship picture has been done solely to promote the Total Divas
programme. We’d be naive to think otherwise. Either the show isn’t getting the
viewers WWE wants – which can’t be true since it’s been commissioned for a
second season – or WWE just want the same number of viewers for that farce as
it does its weekly Raw and monthly pay-per view shows. If the latter is true
then they’re going the right way about it. I’m sure, like at SummerSlam and
Night of Champions WWE will mention the show on air and plug it to death whilst
the match is taking place and why not? What better place to promote the show
than on one which attracts the largest number of viewers per month? When it
comes to selling something, Vince McMahon is the master.
I
would however question the thought process behind it. Is it wise to take a feud
that was in many people’s eyes just getting going, and replace it with one
which features a female performer who isn’t all that in the ring, just to
promote a show which most who tune into Raw don’t watch? Surely you run the
risk of alienating those tuning in to watch wrestling when you use a match and
more importantly a championship, to promote a show. WWE fell at these hurdles
when promoting their movies in years past – and will again when Kane returns
from his shoot on See No Evil 2 and decimates the Wyatt Family in retaliation
for their actions at SummerSlam. So far it’s worked, but you can go to the well
once too often.
WWE
will deny the upcoming fact until they’re blue in the face but the truth
remains that not being the greatest in ring talent – she can do a couple of
things but will never leave and audience satisfied – Brie Bella has only been
inserted into this spot for two reasons. The first is because she’s one of the
main stars of Total Divas and the second is that she’s engaged to Daniel Bryan.
It’s a no brainer. Has she earned her shot? Not really, but right now we’re
stuck with it. And you never know, Brie may have picked up one or two things
from her groom to be. Well, we can hope at least.
I
feel great things ahead for the WWE Divas Division. WWE have already shown
their willingness to stick with one figurehead until the time comes that
another rises in her place. All that’s left is to add the finishing touches.
Winners Prediction: A.J
Lee
Roman Reigns and Seth
Rollins vs Cody Rhodes and Goldust
Okay,
hands up who saw this coming when Cody Rhodes was fired on Raw after SummerSlam?
The inclusion of Goldust and Dusty
Rhodes was just the beginning of what was always going to come down to Goldust
competing in another WWE match. Only let’s hope this time, it’s his last. I don’t mean to sound like the Grinch this
early before December but in 2013, Goldust isn’t the wrestler he once was. The
character was one with a shelf life when he made his debut in 1995. Eighteen
years later, Dustin Rhodes / Runnels has truly wrung the Goldust character dry
– though that will not stop him getting a riotous ovation on October 6th.
When
Damien Sandow shoved Cody Rhodes off of the ladder at Money in the Bank to
claim the briefcase, after a standout performance from the younger Rhodes, many
wondered what the next step would be. Then came the news that WWE were high on
both men and wanted to push them in unison. This led to the so-so one on one
match at SummerSlam and then suddenly, out of the blue, WWE changed course and
fired Rhodes. Not for one moment did anyone who knew about the business think this
was anything but a storyline, but surely Cody Rhodes vs Damien Sandow had more
life in it and much more to give the WWE Universe. Cody Rhodes has been thrown
into a high profile feud with The Corporation – sort of – and Damien Sandow,
the man who should be being prepped for World Heavyweight Championship Match
sometime in 2014 is being mercilessly buried.
There
is no sense in this course of action unless WWE realise they made a mistake at
Money in the Bank. Perhaps WWE have already lost interest in Sandow, in which
case they should take the Money in the Bank briefcase from him as soon as
possible in order to rebuild his character and career. If WWE believe Cody
Rhodes is the next big thing then they’re right. He is. We’ve all seen it for
years; it seems WWE have only just come around to our way of thinking. However,
does this feud really signify the beginning of Cody Rhode’s ascension to the
top? The Shield are a great talent no doubt, but they’re in no position to
elevate Rhodes. This is how it should have gone down.
After
Cody Rhodes’ sacking, WWE should have continued the course which we were
presented with on the previous weeks Raw, in offering him chances to regain his
job. The Big Show would have knocked out Dusty Rhodes as he did and Triple H
would have presented Cody Rhodes with the opportunity to prove that he belonged
in the company by hitting ‘Cross Rhodes’ on his father who had already been
felled by Big Show. Cody – the face – would have refused to strike his father
just for a job thus getting the audiences approval and Triple H would have had
him escorted by Police. When Cody got to the top of the ramp he would have
resisted arrest and before being dragged out issued Triple H with an
alternative, that at Battleground he would run a gauntlet of wrestlers, picked
by Triple H, throughout the night in order to keep his job. If he defeats one
then later in the night he takes on another and so on until he gets to the
final wrestler. Rhodes – to the audiences approval – would have then demanded
that he choose the final opponent. When his wish was granted, Cody Rhodes would
have picked Triple H.
That
would have cemented that Cody Rhodes is no longer the jobber to the stars and
that he means business by challenging the COO of the company. Accepting the
challenge, Triple H would have chosen Seth Rollins, Roman Reigns and Big Show
to be Cody Rhodes first three opponents on the understanding that if he lost
one match he would be gone from the company. When Battleground kicked off,
Rhodes would defeat Seth Rollins in a great opening match which didn’t hurt
Rollins and then go on to defeat Roman Reigns. When it came time for him match
against Big Show, Cody Rhodes would defeat Big Show with aplomb and look really
strong and someone that the fans could believe in. After the Big Show match
Triple H and Stephanie McMahon would march to the ring with Roman Reigns and
Seth Rollins and have Rhodes attacked, forcing Big Show to knock Rhodes out
with the WMD Punch. Later in the show we would be informed that Cody Rhodes had
suffered a concussion and wasn’t cleared to compete.
Triple
H would come to the ring for his match and on the microphone would inform us
that Rhodes won’t be here to wrestle and will never be reinstated. Just as the
referee was about to award the match to Triple H, Cody Rhodes would be shown on
the titan tron in the trainers room, barely coherent, pushing away the doctors
and heading to the ring. Rhodes would compete in the audience’s mind he would
be a fighting hero even though he had a supposed concussion. Rhodes would take
a beating from Triple H and still kick out of everything earning the audiences
backing, finally hitting the ‘Cross Rhodes’ on Triple H. When it looked like
Rhodes would finally win The Shield would run in and attack Rhodes. When the
ref called for a disqualification Stephanie would march out and state she has
made the match no DQ. Triple H and The Shield would then beat Rhodes down so
bad Triple H would then pin him. Rhodes would look like the warrior who was
screwed and on Raw would invade the programme and challenge Triple H to one
more match at Hell in a Cell inside the devils playground. In the match
interference would be barred and it would just be the two of them where Rhodes
would finally win a thrilling Hell in a Cell Match.
That,
my good minions, is how you get someone like Cody Rhodes over. After all of
that, not only would we be able to buy into Cody Rhodes as a challenger and
force in the company he would also be in pole position to challenge Randy Orton
for the WWE Championship. I for once fancy seeing Daniel Bryan vs Randy Orton
vs Cody Rhodes at Survivor Series. I just can’t see that this tag team match is
going to get him anywhere. Reigns and Rollins have all the talent in the world
but aren’t in the right position to do what needs to be done for someone like
Rhodes and with his brother and father there with him at Battleground, I can’t
be the only one who smells a betrayal coming. I may be wrong, but I firmly
predict that with Dusty Rhodes’ NXT job on the line as well as Goldust’s future
job in WWE – like he has one – then one of them is going to betray Cody and
side with Triple H and Stephanie citing the importance of their job as the
reason.
The
stipulation of the match states that of Cody Rhodes and Goldust beat two third
of The Shield then Dusty Rhodes keeps his job as NXT trainer and the Rhodes
brother gets their jobs back. But really, in 2013, who here really wants to see
Goldust as an active member of WWE’s roster? No, me neither. Which leads me to
believe that Cody Rhodes and Goldust won’t prevail at Battleground and the
story will continue well into Survivor Series, which at the moment is looking
to be; Cody Rhodes, Dusty Rhodes, Goldust and Daniel Bryan vs Randy Orton and
The Shield.
One
would also have to question the validity of putting Reigns and Rollins in this
match, especially if the WWE Tag Team Championships aren’t on the line. Maybe
WWE thought that if they put the doubles gold on the line then it would almost
certainly give the result of the match away. No one is feasibly going to
believe in this day and age that WWE are going to make Goldust one half of the
Tag Team Champions, so perhaps WWE have kept the gold back as a measure to keep
reality suspended. Of course, maybe the company just don’t have anything else
to do with The Shield in October 2013. If that is the case, then WWE are
wasting three great talents.
With
Survivor Series and the Royal Rumble fast approaching, WWE really need to shift
their plans for The Shield into fourth gear. At Hell in a Cell WWE could make
history by staging the first ever six man tag team hell in a cell match if they
could find three worthy opponents for the trio and then have them dominate
Survivor Series defeating three or four more worthy opponents. It’s the only fool
proof way of making sure Reigns, Rollins and Ambrose who is absent from
Battleground remain important in the public’s eye. The company cannot afford to
mess up with these three and seeing as they have gone off the boil in recent
months, its time for that famous WWE machine to get back behind the trio and
churn out something worthwhile.
Winners Prediction: Seth
Rollins and Roman Reigns
WWE Intercontinental
Championship Match
(c) Curtis Axel vs
R-Truth
I
can’t say with any great enthusiasm that this is going to be one of the
standout matches at Battleground, because I doubt it will be. With hardly any
build up or story – the match is based on R-Truth defeating Axel on Raw and
then Axel getting his revenge on the pre Battleground Smackdown – I doubt anyone
is looking forward to this match. It looks bad for Axel, but it wouldn’t have
seemed half as bad had WWE at least bothered to build R-Truth up in the run up
to this match with some impressive victories.
On
the Smackdown one week ago, R-Truth lost in a squash match signifying that WWE
do not have big plans for the man formerly known as K-Kwik. Which begs the
question, that when you’re trying to rebuild the WWE Intercontinental
Championship, why make a match which is 1) treated as an afterthought and thrown
onto the card 48 hours – from airtime – before a pay-per view and 2) give the
champion you’re trying to push an opponent who no one cares about? It boggles
the mind that WWE believe the best way to get the Intercontinental Championship
over again is to have Curtis Axel, a man who hasn’t had the start that was
predicted for him, defend against a mere nobody, which R-Truth is in 2013 on a
pay-per view.
With
Triple H taking charge of the lesser talent in WWE and their direction as well
as the head of youth development, amongst his many other jobs, you would have
thought ‘The King of Kings’ may have realised that the Championship which
helped make him as well as those around him like The Rock and Stone Cold Steve
Austin a star, needs a better push and more backing than its currently getting
at the moment. WWE could have literally picked anyone else from their roster
for this match and even Kofi Kingston, who will battle Bray Wyatt at
Battleground, would have given Curtis Axel a better fight than he will get from
R-Truth.
In
2013 and 2014 I don’t see R-Truth as a main or even major under card player in
WWE. His last major contribution to the company was his challenged to the WWE
United States Championship in 2012 held by Antonio Cesaro. Though those matches
went from bad to okay, Truth was not considered for one moment as a name to
dethrone Cesaro in 2012. I have to believe that he’s merely a filler while WWE
find something more meaningful to do with the Intercontinental Champion.
Anyway,
if Truth did defeat Axel for the gold then what? What could R-truth possibly
add to the company with one its pieces of gold around his waist? He’s not seen
as a viable replacement for Axel or anyone on the roster. Truth isn’t so
staunchly loved by the fans that they would be willing to pay out to see him
rebuild the division and even if they did, I don’t believe that R-Truth has the
skill to be the figurehead of the once lauded division. There is nothing
R-truth can possibly add to WWE in 2013 or the Intercontinental Championship
division. The only reason R-Truth is in this match and indeed booked to compete
at Battleground is so that WWE can hand Curtis Axel a pay-per view victory in
order to help rebuild his image after too many losses.
Speaking
of the Intercontinental Champion, Curtis Axel has been treated appallingly by
WWE since he won the super triple threat match against The Miz and Wade Barrett
at Payback. What should have happened seemed to slip WWE’s mind and they
instead implemented what they believed a young upstart who has the world in
front of him, should be doing to pay his dues. It’s about time WWE are everyone
in wrestling got over this whole ‘paying your dues’ before you get a big break.
In 2013, WWE don’t have the star names to pad out the top of the card whilst the
younger talent pay their dues and in reality it’s just an excuse as to why
they’re not pushing some of the more younger and deserving talent.
I
hope that his feud with C.M Punk would be the making of Axel, something that he
could get his teeth into and run with. On the other side of the fence, Axel had
a seasoned pro that has put many men over and made many more careers than Axel
has had matches. It shouldn’t have failed to work. Punk should have helped get
Axel over and Axel should have shot to stardom after the feud was over. But
like everything else in WWE, things don’t work the logical way. WWE were never
planning to make Curtis Axel a star from the Punk feud, instead just biding
their time and using the Intercontinental Champion as a bridge into Punk’s next
feud with Ryback.
I
wonder if WWE stopped for one moment to think about what that would do to
Axel’s image with the fans. Did they even bother to think that he may be seen
as a mere bit player who was used as cannon fodder in order for WWE to
implement a bigger and better drawing warfare? Of course not. Like almost
everything else they have their mind set on, WWE went in with their big size
twelve’s and trampled over everything. Only this time it was Curtis Axel who
got caught in the stampede. Had the C.M Punk feud been handled right then WWE
could have had a new main event star on their hands – instead now, they have a
hell of a job to do with Axel before he’s ready to be that star and its mostly
of their own doing.
It’s
not just WWE’s fault though. It would be easy to credit WWE with the whole mess
up but when you cast your eyes back on some Axel’s more important moments, then
you will see that he’s not stepped up to the mark. For a man who is the son of
a WWE legend – and that fact may be a factor in his disappointing start with
his new character – Axel has strolled through matches with a lack of zeal or
enthusiasm. At Money in the Bank he had the chance to prove to WWE that he
could take someone like The Miz and steal the show with them. It was Axel’s
chance to wow the audience and the booking team backstage. He didn’t. On the
night, Curtis Axel took a laidback approach to his job and simply walked
through his match without seemingly a care in the world.
His
SummerSlam he was left off of the card and at Night of Champions he once again
failed to totally impress. I can’t pinpoint what’s wrong with Henning. There
doesn’t seem to be the flair that his father had or he should display. It’s
almost like he doesn’t want to do it or he’s held back by the weight of
expectation from his father as well as being packaged as a character who uses
his fathers finishing move and entrance theme – which is weaved into his own.
WWE can’t expect Henning to be a replica of his father. Mr. Perfect was a one
off, never to be repeated or replicated. It’s no goods the company giving Axel
Mr. Perfect’s traits and crossing their fingers, hoping for the best. It’s not
going to happen. With Paul Heyman, WWE have given Curtis Axel a fighting chance,
but they have to stop saddling him with the weight of expectation his father
came with, otherwise he’s going to fail and it’ll be another name struck off of
the future main event roster.
Winners Prediction:
Curtis Axel
Battleground Kick-Off
Match
Damien Sandow vs Dolph
Ziggler
Insert
sigh here. What a come down for both Dolph Ziggler and Damien Sandow. After his
Money in the Bank 2013 victory Damien Sandow should be on top of the world and
being prepped for a serious World Heavyweight Championship challenge sometime
next year. Yet since his victory he’s lost at SummerSlam and almost every week
on Raw and Smackdown. Do WWE really think that having him keep losing will
endear us to Sandow as a future champion? They should have learnt from Dolph
Ziggler’s stop / start push in 2012 after Ziggler won the very same match. His
burial at the hands of John Cena only put him back and when he did win the
title it was out of nowhere and WWE took it off of him two months later.
That’s
the problem with Money in the Bank winners who aren’t huge stars. They have to
be given the chance or the vicious circle of repeating main events come around
again and again, but the company has put the machine behind them. Damien Sandow
needed huge victories in the weeks leading up to and after SummerSlam,
including prospering over Cody Rhodes on the biggest event of the summer. When
it comes time for Sandow to cash in, then who is going to believe that a man
who has regularly lost to the whose who of jobbers can carry the World
Heavyweight Championship and the company? It’s a ridiculous notion which WWE
need to shake out of their heads.
Half
of the problem is the unwillingness by WWE to take another chance. To them,
having Sandow going over wrestlers like RVD, Alberto Del Rio, Randy Orton and
so on is to much of a risk to the bigger stars images. Do WWE really think that
after doings jobs for everyone over the last two years Randy Orton is going to
be damaged by a defeat to Damien Sandow? No. And the three mentioned are the
perfect three to get the faux scholar over. After RVD’s stint in the World
Heavyweight Championship picture it would be a wise move to punt him down the
ladder to feud with Sandow. A couple of pay-per view victories, including being
the sole survivor at Survivor Series would do Sandow no end of good in WWE and
certainly start him off on the road to where he needs to be in 2014.
As
for Dolph Ziggler – well what can I say? The man who is clearly the future of
this company is being treated shoddily by it. Ziggler’s World Heavyweight
Championship reign should have gone at least into SummerSlam and to strip him
of the title because you need him to bring the best out of the bumbling Big E.
Langston is a huge oversight. WWE could have just as easily booked another
singles match between A.J and Kaitlyn at SummerSlam and left Langston off of
the card as an active wrestler, in order to book a triple threat match for the
World Heavyweight Championship on the August spectacular. But that would have
been too easy.
In
October 2013, Dolph Ziggler should be at the top, competing for the WWE and /
or World Heavyweight Championship. There’s no reason for his talents to be
wasted in defeats on Raw and Smackdown and certainly not on the kick-off show
of an untested pay-per view which may not be around next year depending on its
success this year. It’s mindless that Dolph Ziggler is constantly kept back. He
has the look, the skills, the popularity and if you asked anyone in the WWE
Universe then most would say that they’d prefer Dolph Ziggler in the main event
to on a programme which most will only see when it’s released on DVD.
This
would be a perfect place to start for WWE to build Damien Sandow. They’ve had
their fun and got over whatever point they were trying to get across but this
is getting beyond a joke. He can’t win on pay-per view, he can’t win on weekly
television and if Damien Sandow can’t be afforded a win on the pre-show match
to a pay-per view then we may have to start looking at the possibility that
Damien Sandow is never going to break that glass ceiling after all.
Winners Prediction:
Damien Sandow
Like
most WWE pay-per view events in 2013, Battleground is strong at the top and
weak at the bottom. If it was a building then October’s first pay-per view
(Hell in a Cell follows on October 27th) would tumble before it was even put
up. There aren’t enough strong lower card matches to support the weight of the
main event matches and even though the wrestlers were there to change this
(Dean Ambrose and Christian have been left off of the card), WWE haven’t
bothered.
Randy
Orton vs Daniel Bryan will be another cracking effort of that I’m sure and it
will advance the story as we approach the end of the year, but I can’t see
anything else at Battleground stunning the audience. In fact it has ‘B’ level
pay-per view written all over it. I doubt we’ll remember this event in a year’s
time but then again the opportunity is there for WWE and its talent to prove us
wrong.
It
could have been so much better had WWE taken a risk on a WarGames match, the
company could have elevated six or seven names in one night and been better off
for it when the post WrestleMania 30 period kicked in, in April. But this month
Vince McMahon wasn’t willing to risk a little to gain a lot and if something
isn’t done about the state of WWE’s mid-card soon, then the whole company is
going to be a battleground as the unsatisfied talent go to war with WWE’s
hierarchy.
Onwards
and upwards...